«Chutzpah is a word I had spelled in big letters on a board at my home. I think one should take up the cause of
it. Fanni lives it and it has something amusing about it. One gets far with chutzpah and it is essential to know that chutzpah
is allowed, but it is never applied because we walk around the streets completely domesticated, that chutzpah will be extinct
at some point. » Daniel Hoesl, Katharina Posch and Gerald Kerkletz talk about SOLDATE JEANNETTE that conquered its first audience at the Sundance
Soldate Jeanette evokes three female characters from cinematic history: Jeanne dArc in the movie by Carl Theodor Dreyer, Nana Kleinfrankenheim
in Jean-Luc Godards Vivre sa vie and Jeanne Dielmann by Chantal Ackermann. Have all three contributed to the idea for this
movie, to the composition of both female characters?
Daniel Hoesl: They are three women who lead the same fight, and one learns that hardly anything has changed, and most of all,
that one must not stop fighting this fight. Our movie is another contribution to this topic.
Katharina Posch: Adding to this is that soldate is a coinage, an artificial word. There isnt a female form
of the word soldier, soldat, in French, like it would be in German. The word in the title therefore is a mistake,
the mistake is the female gender, and this really cannot be true. Thats why its written in bold letters on the
movie poster. I just arrived from Paris and there I was frequently asked for the reason of this spelling. I answered Because
it is a mistake. A mistake that the female gender doesnt exist. When you watch the movie, youll find the
answer to that.
Daniel Hoesl: The stimulus for the movie actually came from a totally different direction, it came through two pieces of music.
One is by Beck and called Soldier Jane, the other is Schuberts Die Täuschung. We chose those two pieces to stake out
what the plot will be like. We did not have a script, our starting point was based on a casting. We agreed that the movie,
in deflection of the song lyrics, should be about women. Also, the version of the Schubert song, which originally was written
for a male voice, is based on an interpretation by Christine Schäfer.
Which lyrics underlie both musical pieces?
Daniel Hoesl: Soldier Jane, dont be afraid to take your heart out of your shell. And in Schuberts
Die Täuschung: Only deception is my gain. Those are the thoughts that we use in the movie. Apart from that, the
music plays an important role in the finished movie. It was rather difficult to find suitable pieces. I listened to a lot
of music and I was very happy when I finally found Bettina Köster, who was spontaneously willing to travel, act and provide
Was the focus of pre-production on the music?
Daniel Hoesl: Music was the starting point. The essential in pre-production was the casting, even before we had a story line.
We knew that under the aspect of a minimal budget we only had a certain time frame in which we could work and finish shooting.
I got to know two profoundly different women, the storyline developed from their biographies: The one actually did work on
a farm for board and lodge at some point. The other woman comes from a former aristocratic family, grew up in a castle and
has all the makings to build a contrast.
Therefore the actresses provided the essential input in the cinematic tale?
Gerald Kerkletz: It was our plan to include our cast in something like a co-authorship, to give them the opportunity to influence
the story through their own biographies. Simultaneously the cast and all the other team members had the assignment to contribute
things like contacts, locations, vehicles or costumes.
Katharina Posch: Production-wise the project was manageable, since all involved were willing to share the responsibility.
Daniel Hoesl: We worked only with what we found, we did not go and scout for something we wished. And this leads back to where
Gerald Kerkletz and I found each other, in a hospital geriatrics, shooting Ulrich Seidls Import Export. One could claim
that Ulrich Seidl's method of finding people and assembling stories, is quite similar to ours, but he usually has a basic
idea about the morals of his story, we on the other hand deliberately didnt. We could not afford going on a search for
certain things we wanted to find. Our search was the finding, in a Picasso kind of way. Furthermore, Gerald Kerkletz and I,
apart from both enjoying having a sauna, share a common interest, we both cook. Working on Soldate Jeanette was like cooking.
We have a common favorite chef, Pierre Gagnaire, a forerunner of Nouvelle Cuisine. He, who of course has many years of experience
as a chef, doesnt use recipes to create meals, he simply opens the fridge, constrains on a few things and creates a
meal, a unique piece of art.
Gerald Kerkletz: Pierre Gagnaire deliberately constrains himself, even before he decides what should come out of it. His creativity
originates from what he has, not from what he would like to have. For us, this principle is transferable onto the artistic
as well as the production process. Daniel isnt someone who generally opposes to writing a script. But with this movie
he didnt want to think up things that he couldnt have in the end, because it is his first feature length film,
and many things would simply be too expensive, complicated or couldnt be found. For example when the storyline is determined
by the motives and vice versa. Then I can find locations that look expensive but in reality arent. When I fixate on
something, or have to make something work because of a mandatory script, I have to count on costs, for example a production
design, accordingly to it. I have to be in a position to conduct any necessary effort, which you might not even see in the
movie, even though it costs a fortune.
It sounds like, not only were you short of money on this project, but also short of time?
Daniel Hoesl: Time is a question of budget. You can buy time with a greater budget. We had 25 days of shooting in a timespan
of six to seven weeks, in which to accomplish the shoot. I think we were highly efficient, measured by how few people overall
and how many amateurs were involved.
Gerald Kerkletz: Also in respect of the camera work it was important to us, that despite the little technology, the smallest
possible team and working without a script, it is in no contradiction to shooting a photographically framed, precise and formal
considered, maybe even a visually sophisticated movie. It was never about a documentary aesthetic.
Also, the dialogs do not sound as if they were improvised last-minute?
Daniel Hoesl: The dialogs are more improvised than you might think, because Johanna Orsini-Rosenbergs lingo naturally equals
Schönbrunner German, which hardly exits in this for anymore. The language-bastards are more and more eradicated
in favour of standard language, which mirrors the uniformity of society very well. Within the milieu, Johannas origins,
people commonly speak artificial, which I like. I do not regret though, that it isnt even more artificial, but it might
as well have been a more stylized.
Despite the strong focus on the biographies, was there a concept with which the actresses could start their work?
Daniel Hoesl: We rehearsed and we practised on the language. Johanna Orisini-Rosenberg is a different person than Fanni in
the movie, but she could resort to a repertoire in her biography and knew how people who have a lot of money feel, after they
lost it all. It is essential that she has a reference point to people with such a story, when at some point all the money
has gone. This strikes many. It leads us, looking back at the song lyrics, to the theme: To leave from places you feel locked
in and, this applies mostly to the woman from the city, that society maps out the criteria for success and values. For the
woman at the farm, it is more about to release herself from dominance, to break out of the structure. Our approach, in a clear
and enlightening Rousseauian sense is: Do not do what you do not want to do.
Gerald Kerkletz: Especially because there isnt a well elaborated, every detail reviewed story, it is even more important
that the roles are clearly defined. We all did not know, until a week before end of shooting, how the movie is going to end.
This way we also had the possibility to react upon everything that has been shot already. The actors need to know very precisely
who they are in the movie, in order to spontaneously react upon changes that developed during breakfast before shooting or
lunch at the set.
Which campaign does Soldate Jeannette lead, which war is she going to?
Katharina Posch: Ehhh, who is Jeannette actually?
Gerald Kerkletz: Through the three women of cinematic history mentioned at the beginning, the trail is laid that any women
could be Soldate Jeannette.
Daniel Hoesl: Also we feature music by GUSTAV. On the Album Verlass die Stadt (Leave the City) is a song called Soldat_in oder Veteran (Soldier or Veteran), and the song used in the movie is called Alles renkt sich wieder ein (Everything's gonna be fine). GUSTAV isnt just a musician, but a rebel for freedom. Mundane as it may sound, it is very challenging to attack this
Katharina Posch: What happens through Eva Jantschitsch's music, the musician behind GUSTAV, is a good example of what has
constantly occurred in our project. As a result of us not wanting anything, we regularly were presented with gifts, with findings.
Especially when it comes to the music of Eva Jantschitsch, which was not considered for the movie from the beginning. Only
when the movie was close to finished did we find this amazing song and with it the musical circle was closed.
Daniel Hoesl: The fight of these three women, as well as of the artists like GUSTAV or Bettina Köster, results in a coherency.
This fight is about finding alternatives to give life circumstances. One isnt per se happy when born rich or when born
on a farm. It is probably just about getting off your ass. It was important to me that, when we talk about the desire for
freedom, we do not show it like it is usually done in the classical middle-European author movies, watching the protagonists
struggle and fail, but rather showing two protagonists who stand up and walk a path of new possibilities. One should step
out of this movie, thinking: I can do that too.
Courage for rebellion in a way.
Katharina Posch: Rebellion, in an acoustical sense, sounds incredibly loud. What I like about this movie, and the path Fanni
and Anna choose is, that it is so quiet but not any less rebellious because of it.
Daniel Hoesl: Chutzpah is a word I had spelled in big letters on a board at my home. I think one should take up
the cause of it. Fanni lives it and it has something amusing about it. One gets far with chutzpah and it is essential to know
that chutzpah is allowed, but it is never applied because we walk around the streets completely domesticated, that chutzpah
will be extinct at some point. Chutzpah was also essential for the production process. Without my telephone calls with location
owners , who generally confirmed and thanks to the long experience that I have in this area, we could shoot at locations which
otherwise would have been out of our reach. It is a similar story with our actors. When I think about who is plausible as
a shoe sales man, who is a real dandy, the factor community and friendship plays an important role in casting, as well as
production. I had to quickly find someone who would fit. The people in the movie from the art scene where simply present in
the moment we needed them. Or regarding location, a friend of an actress was on vacation, therefore we could shoot in her
apartment. The collective group factor is very important. I've always been impressed by Alain Tanner and Michel Sutter and
their way of making movies in the early seventies with Group5 in French-Switzerland. As there was no movie funding system
established at the time, they could receive funds from Télévision Suisse Romande in order to shoot movies with a small
budget. Little money, but little bureaucracy. This way directors could develop themselves artistically by simply working.
Not all movies were good, but many were good. I do not want to question the funding system here. It is good, and I profit
from it when I work on a different project as assistant director. But I still think that there is a different way of making
movies. Earlier we talked about language and the disappearance of certain dialects. There is a uniformity when it comes to
making movies and therefore of the cinematic art. This uniformity is supposed to fill certain formats, but it kills the artist,
the individual spirit and the spirit of independent cinema, which is all about independent thinking. It is a fight we eagerly
lead. However, we would have made the movie even without any money.
Who supported the movie?
Katharina Posch: The movie was supported by bm:ukk, the province of Lower Austria, Cine Art Styria and the cultural office
of the city of Vienna, altogether we had a budget of 65.000,-. Not every project demands the same execution, and this
project was not presented on a blank sheet of paper to the funding offices. We had a dossier filled with the main cast, locations,
mood, scene sequences and an argumentative work method which proposed the security of us knowing which goal we are working
towards. At the same time, because of the work method and the frame we drew of this movie, it was possible to work with a
very small budget. Self-exploitation is not the goal, not even with a movie like this. In our case, something different wouldnt
have been possible because we wanted to try something different.
Gerald Kerkletz: A binding script, a more or less common method of operating and production condition gives all involved a
sense of security and are therefore, for most funding institutions mandatory. Often despite the fact that a project
with a different approach, might be more harmonious or cheaper to produce. I personally believe that the movie industry would
profit more, the more diverse it is, and this does not only apply to finished movies but also to the production stories. On
that note, I think we should risk something together more often.
Daniel Hoesl: I have written movie scripts and I will continue to write movie scripts. There should be a possibility to realize
movies differently, as an alternative, since we follow this philosophy of cooking. Soldate Jeannette didnt need a script.
Does the form apply to the content?
Daniel Hoesl: This goes hand in hand. I hope that the one speaks for the other. That at least was our plan. It requires a
philosophy to work this way and the necessity to understand that, next to the regime thee is freedom, this freedom you have
to take and pay the price.
This way of producing leads to content and one is so richly rewarded with possibilities of content. When its about décor,
costumes, casting, one is presented with a Carte blanche which gives you total freedom. To have a script has other advantages
There are very interesting elements in pictorial design and rhythm. Idly waiting in the safe room takes probably longer than
seduction and a night of love. Figures are only shown as pars pro toto (foot in the shoe, neck with pearl necklace), a scene
in the train is entirely spoken from the off while the camera is fixed onto the tracks. How did the premises pictorial design
Gerald Kerkletz: Only in retrospective did it become clear to me that our formal use of pictures and stories in the movie,
reflects our method of working and the conditions of the shoot. Resolution was all about breaking it down to a minimum. No
establishing shots, reverse shots only when really necessary. When faced with the decision whether we wanted a distance shot
or a close up, we would decide on the spot and did not leave it up to cutting. To get back to cooking language: as long as
the story continued to develop it was important not to get lost in a sea of spices, exotic ingredients which can be imported
from all over the word and a really hard to find, but to manage with the five, six, seven, with seven being an important number
to us, we never wanted to go beyond seven-essential things. Our team practically never consisted of more than seven people.
When Ernst meets Fanni for the first time, there isnt a reverse shot. Was this reverse shot never actually filmed or
was it cut out later?
Gerald Kerkletz: It never existed. Things have of course changed a bit during cutting, but within a scene hardly anything
We hear a whole dialog scene in a train, yet we see the train in a distance shot from above
Katharina Posch: That we shot the train scene the way we did, was on the other hand for production reasons.
Daniel Hoesl: Prehistory is that we couldnt afford to shoot with the Austrian Railways. Without money one gets into
quite kafkaesque situations and therefore we ended up with this solution which I prefer, dealing with the situation by coping
with it and applying our rigid standards to the situation. You cannot tell the story any faster than this. It is fun to challenge
Gerald Kerkletz: This scene developed through a rejection, which in retrospective one could call another gift. You only have
the idea to do it in that way, when you are forced to.
Daniel Hoesl: The city in the first part of the movie depicts itself, as it presents itself. In rectangles, with walls and
square angles, density: one feels driven into a corner. That is why there is a rigid adjustment. The first tilt happens in
the forest. Camera-wise the movie splits into three parts: the city part, the forest part and the country part. The farm mixes
the styles as industrial farming methods have moved in. First there is a break through the first hand camera scene, later
the farm offers an assembly of opportunities through its architecture and the architecture of the management of the farm.
And then the landscape implodes. This changes the camera perspective.
Gerald Kerkletz: The breakfast scene, which only consists of close-ups, is another example for efficiency. We never shoot
coverage. Later in the movie, there is a welcome party for Fanni which was filmed entirely in one total view. There we did
not film any close-ups. For me it was a lot about not to think of the small team, the little budget, the short time as a disadvantage,
but as a challenge to concentrate on the essentials.
For this interview you spontaneously decided that you, as the three backbones of this project, wanted to talk about this collaboration
together. How did this synergy develop, what stands behind the European Film Conspiracy Collektive?
Katharina Posch: I met Gerald Kerkletz through Nikolaus Geyrhalter film production, where I'm employed junior producer. He
told me briefly about Daniel in May 2011 and showed me two short movies by him. His short The Madness of the Day was very appealing to me. I just came back from Middle America where I had been in touch with the independent movie industry
through my work there at film festivals. At this point we only knew that we wanted to shoot a movie by fall 2011, which on
such short notice is impossible when going through the normal funding process. We had to stick to the timeframe though because
of our actors. So we started to look for locations, build a team, create funding documents. This movie was a heart-matter
for me, even if it was difficult at times to afford it financially as well as time-wise.
Gerald Kerkletz: I let myself get involved with this project out of joy for experimenting and because I knew what Daniel stands
for. Within an idea of complicity, people found each other to try something new, even though they were advised against it.
From the moment on where we saw the projection of the movie and therefore its existence, we had a feeling that we made it,
regardless of this recognition from outside. Everything that happened afterwards, Rotterdam, Sundance and what still may come,
is good for us, but it stays the movie, the experiment which we were proud of from the beginning.
Daniel Hoesl: I stay with my artistic pigheadedness. If nobody saw the movie, it wouldnt have influenced me. Not because
I have no interest in the public, but because I know that I will break once I bend. If the next movie isnt successful,
so be it. I have already made movies that did not have a premiere at all. Nevertheless those are great movies, without which
collaboration with Gerald and Katharina, who both saw these movies, would have never happened. Even if these movies arent
shown at any festivals, they remain pioneer movies for an independent way of thinking. European Film Conspiracy is not a company,
but a philosophy. It is a collective like Groupe 5, and its philosophy consists of working with the minimum, working together
and community based. This offeres about artistic freedom necessary.
Gerald Kerkletz: The European Film Conspiracy for me is the idea of shooting a movie with a circle of friends and walking
on paths that may not be found in a map. For some goals the security of established paths totally make sense. In a movie like
Michael for instance, I was grateful for it but that was a totally different movie. If Daniel writes a script that demands
classical financial and production conditions, it probably wont be a movie by the European Film Conspiracy, we would
seek a production company then. But if we feel like walking off the common paths again, we will have the possibility to refine
this kitchen. I do hope for a little more money then. But the philosophy of the European Film Conspiracy should not be afflicted
Who did the cooking during the shoot?
Katharina Posch: Barbara Wilding cooked very well. She and all the other colleagues earned a big credit, without them this
movie wouldnt have been possible.
Daniel Hoesl: It is very essential when in a community (in opposition to our society) to be there for each other, to cook,
to sit down and take the time, not only to consume together, but to be together.
Interview: Karin Schiefer
Translation: Karolina Ellinger